Wednesday, May 17, 2006

 

Dung Deal

.
Patricia Princehouse is a philosopher of science and an evolutionary biologist at Case Western Reserve University who helped found Ohio Citizens for Science, an organization of scientists, teachers, clergy, and other concerned citizens, that has fought to preserve science education in Ohio's public schools. On May 11, 2006, she was awarded a Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Award from the Playboy Foundation. There is a trancript of her acceptance speech at The Nation magazine's website.

It is not only worthy of your attention because of the tale of how flung elephant dung led to the discovery of an Australopithecus afarensis trackway but for her (correct) take on why everyone should fight the attempt to harness the teaching of science to sectarian theological concerns: it is to protect freedom of religion, which is, in turn, "the bedrock foundation of liberty in this country."

The Constitution is not self-executing:

I used to think the US Constitution was fixed, an absolute guarantee of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press in this country. The past five years have shown me that the Constitution is valuable only insofar as people are willing to stand up for the rights it protects. Our freedoms are guaranteed only as long as ordinary, everyday people are willing to claim them -- indeed, to insist on them.

James Madison, as responsible for our Constitution as anyone, doubted that a "parchment barrier" would suffice to secure our liberties and questioned the need for a Bill of Rights. He came to realize though, that without a ringing statement of those rights to rally the common citizen to protect those liberties, it would be all too easy to surrender them piecemeal or at the first sign of danger.

No one in the world today can wrest those freedoms from us but all too many of us are willing to relinquish them without a thought and even more are too indifferent or too ignorant to care.

If we allow certain special-interest religious groups to co-opt the public school science classroom, to use it as a vehicle for converting children to religious views their parents don't hold, if we allow them to spout outright lies about the nature and content of science, what do we really have left? If you can lie about science and get away with it, you can lie about anything.

Evolution is just the tip of the iceberg or, as the creationists put it, the leading edge of "the wedge." The wedge they are seeking to drive through the heart of American democracy. The lies about science are not limited to evolution. Every day more lies about science seep into public consciousness. Lies about stem cell biology, lies about global warming, about clean air and water, lies about sexuality, about conception and contraception, lies about the effects of hurricanes on metropolitan infrastructure.

But of course, they won't say that:

The enemies of democracy use the language of tolerance to attack it from inside. Why, they ask, are we "censoring" the evidence for "intelligent design"? Why do we deny our teachers the "right" to use their "academic freedom" to teach "critical analysis" of evolution. Isn't it only fair to teach both the evidence for and against evolution? All these clever ploys play well in the media on this issue ...

That means all people who care for their liberties must, as Madison foresaw, be willing to take up the fight, no matter how difficult and unpleasant:

So the rhetorical battle is pitched and the enemy is well armed. But it turns out that standing up for freedom and democracy is a lot like doing science. You start with noble principles and do the best you can, but when you get right down to it, you spend a lot of time dodging elephant dung.

Defending the Constitution is a messy business, but is it worth it? You betcha. Our future depends on it.

.
Comments:
Thanks for that, John. Patricia's a warrior.

RBH
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

. . . . .

Organizations

Links
How to Support Science Education
archives